Building an effective team for cybercrime investigation requires strategic planning and a deep understanding of the necessary competencies. Leveraging frameworks like Europol’s for a broad organisational view and considering NIST’s detailed insights for specific roles aids in forming a skilled team. Deciding between nurturing in-house expertise or opting for outsourcing is a crucial consideration that varies across agencies. This article explores how to use these competency frameworks to build a cybercrime investigation capability.

When building a cybercrime investigation capability, understanding and meeting the varied training needs across an organisation is crucial. From frontline officers to executive management, each role demands a unique set of skills to effectively combat digital threats. This post explores how specialised training, tailored to the specific requirements of different organisational levels, forms a foundational building block for enhancing cybercrime investigation capabilities.

Choosing the optimal structure when an organisation is planning a cybercrime investigations capability is a complex task. An agency has potential advantages in both the Local Resources Model’s autonomy and the Partnership Model’s collaborative strength.

Cybercrime presents unique challenges for investigative organisations. An effective investigation capability hinges on integrating the Cybercrime Investigation Building Blocks (CIBB): Structure, Major Systems, Facilities, Personnel, and Training.